For developers & technical writers

Rewrite the format.
Keep the facts.

Paste a technical note. Growpost adapts it for each platform and leaves code, numbers, versions and names exactly as you wrote them.

note.mdsample

1## Soft deletes got 9x faster
2 
3Our users table has 4M rows, ~60% soft-deleted.
4Every query filtered on deleted_at IS NULL.
5 
6-- Postgres 16: partial index
7CREATE INDEX users_active_email
8  ON users (email)
9  WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;
10 
11p95 login query: 180ms → 20ms.

1/ Our login query went from 180ms → 20ms (p95) with one index. 2/ The users table: 4M rows, ~60% soft-deleted. Every query filtered on deleted_at IS NULL. 3/ Fix: a partial index that only covers live rows. CREATE INDEX … WHERE deleted_at IS NULL on Postgres 16. 4/ If you soft-delete, check your indexes. Most of them are carrying dead rows.

Kept exactly:✓ Postgres 16✓ deleted_at IS NULL✓ 4M rows✓ 180ms → 20ms✓ partial indexSample data

What changes, and what never does

Technical posts break when a rewrite “simplifies” the one detail that mattered. These are the rules every draft follows.

Adapted per platform

So it reads right where it's posted.

Length and pacingX: tight
The opening linehook
Structurethread / story / slides
How much context is explainedaudience

Never touched

Copied exactly from your note.

Code and identifiersdeleted_at
Numbers and units180ms → 20ms
VersionsPostgres 16
Product, library and API namesCREATE INDEX

The parts you'll use most

Create & GenerateOne note, three platform-native versions, technical details intact.See the feature →ScriptsHook, arc and CTA structure even for dense, code-heavy explainers.See the feature →Brand VoiceKeep it dry and precise, or let some personality through. Your call per post.See the feature →

Why not ChatGPT, or just cross-post?

Three reasonable alternatives, and where each one stops being enough.

	Growpostfor developers	ChatGPTgeneral AI chat	Cross-postingsame text everywhere	Buffer / Hootsuiteschedulers
Rewritten per platform	✓X, LinkedIn and Instagram	✓If you ask for each one	✕Same text everywhere	~Light per-network tweaks
Code, numbers and versions kept exact	✓Instructed to copy them as written	~Can round or rephrase them	✓Unchanged, because nothing is rewritten	~Depends on their AI writer
Video script for an explainer	✓Hook, arc and CTA	~If you ask for it	✕No	✕Not a scripting tool
Needs access to your social accounts	✓No access needed	✓No access needed	✓No access needed	✕Required, that's how they publish

If your priority is scheduling posts to go out automatically, a scheduler is the right tool and Growpost isn't trying to replace it. Cross-posting is free and keeps your facts safe, it just reads worse on every platform but one. Competitor features change often, so check their current docs before deciding.

Questions developers ask

Will it change my code or numbers?+

It's instructed not to. Code, identifiers, numbers, versions and names are carried over as written. Read every draft before posting, because you're the one publishing it.

What happens to code blocks on LinkedIn or Instagram?+

Neither platform formats code blocks, so drafts for them keep code short and inline rather than pasting a long block that will lose its formatting.

ChatGPT can rewrite this too. Why Growpost?+

It can, and it sometimes rounds or rephrases the detail that mattered. Growpost is instructed to treat technical tokens as fixed, and gives you all three platform versions at once.

Why not post the same text everywhere?+

A thread-shaped post reads badly on LinkedIn, and a long LinkedIn post gets cut off on X. Same facts, different shape.

Does it post for me or need API access?+

No. There's no auto-posting and no OAuth. You review and publish everything yourself.

Growpost is also made for

Compare all four →

Creators & personal brandsPost every day, still sound like you.Founders & operatorsYour changelog is already your content.Coaches & consultantsThe advice you already give, as posts.

Rewrite the format.Keep the facts.